![\"\"](\"https:\/\/mexicandancemasks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/P1340681.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nIn fact, this first mask has a very simple rim design, and there are red splotches of paint on the cheeks instead of more formal wedge designs.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The nose and teeth were carefully carved.<\/p>\n The simple Christian cross was carved into the surface of the forehead. We will see the same cross on the two masks that follow.<\/p>\n This mask is 7\u00bd inches tall, 5\u00bc inches wide, and 2\u00bd inches deep.<\/p>\n The back shows dark staining from use at the forehead and chin.<\/p>\n I bought this next mask from Tom Kolaz in 1998, ten years after the first. I was fascinated by the floral border, for two reasons: 1. One sees older masks with such symbolic\u00a0 floral decoration (such as the mask featured on September 17, 2018) and 2. sewa<\/em> (flowers) are an important symbol of one of the Yaqui and Mayo spirit worlds, the Sea Ania<\/em>, or “Flower World”.<\/p>\n We immediately see the same gouged out forehead cross, the informal red spots on the cheeks, and similar teeth, although this mask also has an extended tongue. The nose has a different profile but it too is painted with black and white stripes. With all these similarities, I suspect that that these two masks were carved by the same artist.<\/p>\n The rim design consists of flowers with t-shaped buds growing from these crisscrossing vines.<\/p>\n A closer photo follows to highlight the gouged forehead cross, which is apparent in the frontal photo but difficult to see in the brightly lit overhead view.<\/p>\n The hair tufts for the beard have been lost, but wooden pegs (reeds?) remain in some of the holes.<\/p>\n This mask is 7\u00bd inches tall, 5\u00bd inches wide, and 3\u00bc inches deep. If one holds these two masks together, back to back, they have the same shape and virtually the same size.<\/p>\n The similarity in shape is easy to see by comparing the two backs. This mask too has significant staining from heavy use.<\/p>\n This third mask is from the collection of Barney Burns and Mahina Drees, and I photographed it with Mahina’s permission in March, 2016. It had been danced for about 20 years prior to collection. I was delighted to discover this mask in that collection, because it so closely resembles the mask we just examined.<\/p>\n These wedges on the face, although crudely painted (or repainted), are more traditional in design, compared to the spots on the other two masks. On the other hand, the floral rim design and the gouged forehead cross closely resemble those on the second mask, and I see pegs in several holes above the left eye. There is even another extended tongue.<\/p>\n The shaping of the nose and the upper teeth is very like what we observe on the second mask.<\/p>\n The flowered branches extend a little higher on this mask, and flank the forehead cross.<\/p>\n That cross was gouged out.<\/p>\n There are more hollow pegs in the holes where the hair bundles are missing under the mouth. I didn’t record the measurements for this mask.<\/p>\n The back of this mask is more gracefully shaped than those on the other two masks. It too is significantly stained from long use.<\/p>\n Next week I will introduce another important Rio Mayo carver\u2014Sylvestre Lopez.<\/p>\n Bryan Stevens<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One by one, I have been introducing you to a group of Rio Mayo carvers whose masks I first encountered in 1988 or thereabouts. As has been my common experience, the masks of this carver came to me as the … Read More <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n